I spent ages developing an all-encompassing Naming Convention for ALL of our documentation, only to find that large chunks of it have to be ignored and thrown in the bin because FieldView does not recognise the Naming Conventions in Viewpoint, despite the two products being owned by the same company for some time and given common branding.
I know they were developed as separate products but why does development still continue separately for the two, with no effort at all to converge them?
Also it means our site teams tend to want to ignore Viewpoint because they see it as a waste of time and keep trying to pressure my managers to try and pressure me to turn FieldView into an entire duplicate Document Control system (which it isn't).
Mark Boulton
| Company | Westfields Construction |
| Job Title / Role | Document Control Manager |
| I need it... | 6 months |
Dear Viewpoint Suggestion Box contributor;
We at Viewpoint sincerely thank you for your contribution to Suggestion Box on how we can improve Viewpoint products. While we can’t do everything at once, we rely upon your feedback to help guide the prioritization of our product improvements, and Suggestion Box is a critical tool for us to understand and prioritize our customers’ needs.
Viewpoint reviews Suggestion Box regularly for all of our products and updates statuses, adds comments, and performs various house-keeping (including deleting) as needed to ensure that Suggestion Box is maintained as a productive environment for product enhancements requests.
© 2023 Trimble Inc. All Rights Reserved. Viewpoint®, Vista™, Spectrum®, ProContractor™, Jobpac Connect™, Viewpoint Team™, Viewpoint Analytics™, Viewpoint Field View™, Viewpoint Estimating™, Viewpoint For Projects™, Viewpoint HR Management™, Viewpoint Field Management™, Viewpoint Financial Controls™, Vista Field Service™, Spectrum Service Tech™, ViewpointOne™, ProjectSight® and Trimble Construction One™ are trademarks or registered trademarks of Trimble Inc. or its affiliates in the United States and other countries. Other names and brands may be claimed as the property of others.