In the construction world many companies prefer to manage documentation by giving each document a unique document/drawing number followed by a Title as stated on the drawing block/document etc.
What I have consistently found that because it requests Name and Description in 4Ps - we don't get a Document/Drawing number or an accurate Specific Title. On many instances what users have typed into 4ps is not easily identifiable on the actual document.
i.e if it was a Mechanical Drawing - for the name we might get 'Mechanical Drawing Ground Floor' and the description ' GF Ventilation'. On the drawing there my be an Drawing Number and the title is also different.
The name (as above) can be long and ineffective as it will not give the details that a number could do in a short and as we can abbreviate to represent the package, area, type, sequence etc. I.e. if I was to number the above it would be XXXXX(package number)-ME-GA-DR-001 and the Title would be something like_ 'Ten Trinity Square - Mechanical General Arrangement for the Ground Floor Ventilation.' Using description rather than Title can either give too little or too much description when the actual title would be sufficient enough.
Following a specific number that immediately identified the specific package, area, type, seq etc and Title system (which provide the key words) would allow for the project to gain better reporting and searching across all areas.
I look forward to hearing from you.
Guest
| Company | Ardmore Construction |
| Job Title / Role | Senior Document Control |
| I need it... | Yesterday...Come on already |
Dear Viewpoint Suggestion Box contributor;
We at Viewpoint sincerely thank you for your contribution to Suggestion Box on how we can improve Viewpoint products. While we can’t do everything at once, we rely upon your feedback to help guide the prioritization of our product improvements, and Suggestion Box is a critical tool for us to understand and prioritize our customers’ needs.
Viewpoint reviews Suggestion Box regularly for all of our products and updates statuses, adds comments, and performs various house-keeping (including deleting) as needed to ensure that Suggestion Box is maintained as a productive environment for product enhancements requests.
© 2023 Trimble Inc. All Rights Reserved. Viewpoint®, Vista™, Spectrum®, ProContractor™, Jobpac Connect™, Viewpoint Team™, Viewpoint Analytics™, Viewpoint Field View™, Viewpoint Estimating™, Viewpoint For Projects™, Viewpoint HR Management™, Viewpoint Field Management™, Viewpoint Financial Controls™, Vista Field Service™, Spectrum Service Tech™, ViewpointOne™, ProjectSight® and Trimble Construction One™ are trademarks or registered trademarks of Trimble Inc. or its affiliates in the United States and other countries. Other names and brands may be claimed as the property of others.
Please can this be actioned rather than just planned.
Attachments Open full size
Is this something that is going to be actioned?
Attachments Open full size
Can't believe this is still not actioned.
Attachments Open full size
Hi Jeremy,
This was suggestion made years ago, could you tell me why it is taking so long to change the wording from Name to Document Number or Reference as this is very important now as go forward with the BIM numbering conventions.
It has now been nearly 6 years since you said it was going to be fixed soon??
George Mitchell
Attachments Open full size
I think you can do that already using sub folders representing Package, area, type, seq etc..
but Packages may cross different drawing types you can do this with a excel drawing issue sheet.
Attachments Open full size
It looks like this has been in development for nearly 4 years now.....
Please could you action it?
Attachments Open full size
I started asking this over 10 years ago and have been asking every few months ever since............got told no-one else wanted it when i first started asking so lets hope we have the option soon.
Attachments Open full size
2000 years later....maybe it will be implemented before I retire one day
Attachments Open full size
I was told this would be relatively quick win, estimated within a few months?
Attachments Open full size
You could have a look into IEC 82045-2 for a standard of naming metadata fields
Attachments Open full size
Agree. Construction generally uses a unique drawing/document number and a title. 'Name' and 'Description' is confusing.
Attachments Open full size
Thank you for you suggestion - this is currently be looked at in development and hope you have this capability out to you soon.
Attachments Open full size